Home

Add a comment

 

Re: Is the NCSE a waste of resources?

Comment from Scot Rafkin on 09 September 2009 03:59:37 BST #
I'm having trouble with your blog software. It gave me an error when I submitted my earlier comment and only posted the last paragraph. Let me try again... This is a case of winning the battle and losing the war. NCSE is solely committed to defending evolution, not all of science. They see partnering with religious institutions that accept evolution as a winning strategy. It may very well be in the case of evolution. In return, NCSE tacitly if explicitly accepts a quasi-NOMA. But, science and religion are utterly and completely incompatible. Giving an inch in an attempt to defend evolution undermines the rest of science. Having said that, if NCSE goes away, who will defend evolution? What would have become of the Dover trial if not for NCSE? If evolution is supplanted by superstition, will we have not only lost the battle but the war too?

Re: Is the NCSE a waste of resources?

Comment from Anonymous on 08 September 2010 10:41:48 BST #

Title
Body
HTML : b, strong, i, em, blockquote, br, p, pre, a href="", ul, ol, li, sub, sup
Name
E-mail address
Website
Remember me Yes  No 

E-mail addresses are not publicly displayed, so please only leave your e-mail address if you would like to be notified when new comments are added to this blog entry (you can opt-out later).